Search for: "Davis v. Target Corporation"
Results 81 - 100
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
There are very few people who are targeted by lawn encroachment for this type of surveillance. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
See Mohr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
See Mohr v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
The company will be monitored on how it is complying with an order to improve its privacy policy, add new opt-outs for targeted advertising, and disclose how long it keeps users’ data. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:14 pm
The Second Circuit decision in Pippins v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
On the other, and unlike the example provided above of an undercover agent merely “inquir[ing,” about a cyber-attack, the Timberline communication did not comprise an inquiry for general information conveyed within a quasi-public forum (a chat room), but instead a targeted search for specific information, conveyed to the target directly at a virtual location occupied by him only (his Myspace account). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
The recent announcement that a prominent proxy advisory firm [Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS)] is urging the ouster of most of the Target Corporation directors because of the perceived “failure…to ensure appropriate management of [the] risks” as to Target’s December 2013 cyber-attack is another driver that should put directors on notice to proactively address the risks associated with cyber-attacks. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
On 16 July 2014, Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Cartus Corporation v Siddell ([2014] EWHC 2266 (QB)). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
Those without legal training or resources were unprepared for challenges such as defamation, privacy, and copyright claims, and often ran into pitfalls when dealing with issues such as corporate formation, contract negotiation, and development of website policies. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
Those without legal training or resources were unprepared for challenges such as defamation, privacy, and copyright claims, and often ran into pitfalls when dealing with issues such as corporate formation, contract negotiation, and development of website policies. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
Those without legal training or resources were unprepared for challenges such as defamation, privacy, and copyright claims, and often ran into pitfalls when dealing with issues such as corporate formation, contract negotiation, and development of website policies. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
Those without legal training or resources were unprepared for challenges such as defamation, privacy, and copyright claims, and often ran into pitfalls when dealing with issues such as corporate formation, contract negotiation, and development of website policies. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:55 am
And in my last week as the lawfare intern, I attended oral arguments in Ralls Corporation v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm
Judges who have never held elected office — and it hardly seems a mere coincidence that the campaign finance revolution in the Court began with Davis v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
Safa Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:54 pm
Over the rest of the week I’ll be posting developments from 2013 and early 2014 in other key areas: civil and criminal competition law matters, competition law private actions, trade and professional associations and new Competition Bureau guidelines. ____________________ Court of Appeal Upholds “Prevent” Merger Decision In February 2013, the Federal Court of Appeal rejected the appeal of Tervita Corporation (formerly known as CCS Corporation) from the May 2012… [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:05 am
Billingsley v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:10 am
Fortres Grand Corporation v. [read post]
