Search for: "Day v. Schmidt*"
Results 81 - 100
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Legal Standard: ReconsiderationFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) provides, "[a] motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Legal Standard: ReconsiderationFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) provides, "[a] motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment. [read post]
Schmidt on Brown and Constitutional History of Reconstruction (and a Postscript on Hurst and Gutman)
23 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
In this Article, I present the flurry of engagement with the history of the Fourteenth Amendment during the litigation of Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:01 am
Holdings Limited v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
By Eric Goldman Lindsay P. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am
: Telstra & Anor v Phone Directories Co & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Canada The daily digital lock dissenter, day 8: Documentary Organisation of Canada (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 7: Canadian Civil Liberties Association (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 6: Canadian Federation of Students (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 5: Canadian Teachers’ Federation (Michael Geist) Canada… [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 6:56 am
I've been debating whether to take the time to turn it into a short piece for the Army Lawyer -- a decision that implicates our recent discussion about whether law reviews are relevant.But regardless of what I ultimately decide, you certainly won't see the piece in the Army Lawyer any time soon due to an increase in the operational tempo of my day job. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 5:40 pm
” Danica Coto of The Associated Press reports that “Puerto Ricans get their 3rd governor in 6 days. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 6:21 am
Mississippi law permits the counting of ballots that are received up to five business days after the election as long as they are postmarked on or before Election Day. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 4:27 am
Briefly: At The Hill, Lydia Wheeler reports that next term’s partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
I particularly appreciated Breyer’s sharp observation that a court “should never be influenced by the weather of the day but inevitably . . . will be influenced by the climate of the era. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
And I hope that one day it is formally repudiated. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Jirak v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
That requires some examination, not just of the regulation itself, but of the FDA's rationale for it.We could go back in time to our Bone Screw days and draw on some examples there, because we did this a lot back in the day. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
The issue in Kansas v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
Barnette (1943) Frankfurter emphasized that “[t]he Court has no reason for existence if it merely reflects the pressures of the day” and in Dennis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:38 am
Two weeks ago, I discussed the California case of PhoneDog v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 pm
Three days later, on October 3, 2003, Sexton countered with his request for a settlement conference. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am
With fewer than 50 days left until Election Day, dozens of lawsuits in battleground states across the country present a complex litigation landscape well before all ballots are cast and counted. [read post]
