Search for: "Defense Distributed v. Attorney General New Jersey" Results 81 - 98 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
According to plaintiff, pursuant to a Power of Attorney (POA) decedent executed in 1991 and again in 2002 naming defendant as her attorney-in-fact, defendant would from time to time from June 2005 up to decedent's death, either assist her mother with banking transactions, or directly withdraw, transfer, deposit or gift funds from the joint accounts.At the time of decedent's death, plaintiff was living in a separate apartment in her mother's two-family residence, having returned… [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
These areas are (with the year designated a HIFCA) New York and Northern New Jersey – (2000) Los Angeles – (2000) San Juan, Puerto Rico – (2000) The southwest Texas and Arizona/Mexico border – (2000) The northern district of Illinois (Chicago) – (2001) The northern district of California (San Francisco) – (2001) Southern Florida (Miami) – (2003) High Profile Examples/Case Studies In 2006, Charles E. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
 Defendant Wells Fargo Clearing Services moved for dismissal of counts nine and ten of plaintiff's complaint, asserting claims against defendant for negligence and violation of the New Jersey Uniform Fiduciaries Law. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
  Selikoff served as an intern, at the Beth Israel Hospital, in Newark, New Jersey.[20] 1944 – 1946. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Floyd, No. 06-1513 A sentence for offenses arising from a conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and cocaine powder is vacated and remanded where the manner by which the district court reduced defendant's prior sentence of 48 months to a new sentence of 42 months was inconsistent with proper sentencing procedure, and it should have considered a departure from the calculated range of 41 to 51 months, not from the vacated 48-month sentence. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Moving to the defense side, Lack of use as a trademarkdoesn’t just limit attempts to claim TM rights. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
The same caveat appears in the New Jersey Plan (“to appoint all federal officers not otherwise provided for”); the resolutions given to the Committee of Detail (“to appoint to Offices in Cases not otherwise provided for”); the Randolph/Rutledge draft for the Committee of Detail (“to appoint to offices not otherwise provided for. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
The suit, filed in New Jersey state court, centered on Princeton's use of the funds Marie Robertson gave to the university in 1961. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  “Direct means Direct” generally limits coverage to losses of assets that the insured held in an account for a customer or owned by the insured. [2]   In Cumberland & Erly, LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
News In Defense of Animals, December 23, 2009 Wild horse advocates today celebrated a partial victory as U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
News In Defense of Animals, December 23, 2009 Wild horse advocates today celebrated a partial victory as U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Ransomware can come in many forms and iterations and like any other virus or infection, ransomware can evolve and transmogrify to counter cyber-defenses and remediation. [read post]