Search for: "Department of Commerce v. New York" Results 81 - 100 of 752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
Dear New York State Legislators: Deeply hidden from public view inside a report from the New York State Department of Health is a proposal to place an artificial $250,000 cap on medical malpractice pain and suffering claims. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Real Estate commerce is a big time sport in New York, and in Manhattan might be considered a lifestyle unto itself. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am by John Baker
It will be interesting to see how much of the upcoming Supreme Court argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:32 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky and James Kim
The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) has issued an Online Lending Report that calls for the application of New York usury limits to all online lending and increased regulation of online lenders making loans to New York consumers and small businesses. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:45 am by Randy Barnett
Well, as Jonathan notes below, the administration is now apparently telling the New York Times that the individual insurance “requirement” and “penalty” is really an exercise of the Tax Power of Congress. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:16 am
  Tiffany first brought suit against eBay in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging direct and contributory trademark infringement, false advertising and trademark dilution. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
After last week’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:15 am by Yige Wang
” The Supreme Court heard oral argument on the same issue in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am by Nicholas Bronni
But the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Calvin Massey
Department of Agriculture, holding that governmental dispossession of personal property is a per se taking, thus extending the principle laid down in Loretto v. [read post]