Search for: "Dept. of Rehabilitation "
Results 81 - 100
of 263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
., Inc. (2d Dept. 2017), the pain and suffering damages award was increased to $3,500,000 ($1,000,000 past, $2,500,000 future). [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
., Inc. (2d Dept. 2017), the pain and suffering damages award was increased to $3,500,000 ($1,000,000 past, $2,500,000 future). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:35 am
California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation.) [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:46 pm
Incorporated Village of Munsey Park v Manhasset-Lakeville Water District, 2017 WL 2126350 (NYAD 2 Dept. 5/17/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review, Uncategorized [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
Dept. of Social Servs., 452 U.S. 18 (1981) (the Due Process Clause has never been specifically defined; rather, courts are concerned with the ‘fundamental fairness’ in dealing with the particular issues in a given case rather than applying a bright-line rule.) [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:05 am
New York City Transit Authority (1st Dept. 2017) declined to modify the damages award. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am
Dept. of Social Servs. of Durham Cty., North Carolina, that “For all its consequences, ‘due process’ has never been, and perhaps can never be, precisely defined,” and is an “uncertain enterprise. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
He never returned to work and his expert vocational rehabilitation counselor, Charles Kincaid, Ph.D. opined that he never would. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:50 am
City of New York (2d Dept. 2017), the liability verdict was affirmed but the appellate court agreed with the city that a substantial portion of the damages award was excessive. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
Dept. of Social Servs. of Durham Cty., North Carolina, 452 U.S. 18 (1981) (Due process is not a concrete, precisely defined concept, but it “expresses the requirement of ‘fundamental fairness. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:59 pm
Town of Southampton, 2016 WL 7109151 (NYAD 2 Dept. 12/7/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Non-Conforming Uses, Uncategorized [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 5:27 am
City Tr. (1st Dept. 2016), the appellate court (a) reversed the liability finding and remanded the case for a new trial on liability due to erroneous evidentiary rulings by the trial judge but (b) affirmed the damages award “which should stand if the [new] jury finds liability on retrial. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 5:22 am
New York City Transit Authority (1st Dept. 2015), the awards have been substantially reduced – to $1,000,000 for Ms. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
Last week I sent out a survey and asked the question, How The Heck Did YOU End Up in Workers’ Comp? [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm
Gregware was admitted to the trauma unit of a local hospital for 18 days and then transferred to a nursing facility for inpatient rehabilitation for an additional nine weeks. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
I am representing the Plaintiff in the Suffolk Superior Court case appealing Fair Hearing Decision 1409671, where the narrow issue is whether a home is “available” in the absence of a life estate or a trust provision allowing usage of the home. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
I am representing the Plaintiff in the Suffolk Superior Court case appealing Fair Hearing Decision 1409671, where the narrow issue is whether a home is “available” in the absence of a life estate or a trust provision allowing usage of the home. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:40 am
Lavelle (2d Dept. 2015), the appellate court affirmed all of the damages awards but shifted the liability apportionment as follows: 50% to defendant, 10% to plaintiff and 40% to third-party defendant. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:10 am
In Martorella v. 150 Centerville Holding, LLC (2d Dept. 2015) the $185,000 award was affirmed. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 7:51 am
New York City Transit Authority (2d Dept. 2015). [read post]
