Search for: "Dillon v. Day" Results 81 - 100 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm by Rick
Dillon, 34 Cal.3d 441, 479, 194 Cal.Rptr. 390, 668 P.2d 697 (1983) (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 10:06 pm
For instance, suppose A paid Rs. 50,000 for a 20 day luxury cruise which is interrupted after 17 days, he cannot recover the entire sum because the “basis” of the payment was the provision of those luxury services on a continuing basis (see Baltic Shipping v Dillon).* On the other hand, suppose he paid Rs. 50,000 for a Chennai-Singapore-Sydney air ticket, he can recover the entire sum if the plane is unable to continue beyond Singapore, because the… [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 2:05 pm by Richard Hornsby
So here I was watching Saturday Night Live (Google v. iPhone) when I noticed this post on the MarinadeDave blog: ALERT! [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
She gets a preliminary injunction, just weeks after filing, or even a temporary restraining order (whether or not ex parte) just days after filing. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm by David Lat
It’s not nearly as fun to read as, say, Dillon v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
(i.e. birthday greetings, holiday invitations, condolences, days of special meaning, family events, etc. etc.) are impacted. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:09 pm
In re Dillon, 919 F.2d 688, 692 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And as to that other litigation, Snyder and Dillon can be treated as non-party witnesses and made to sit for depositions. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:48 am by SHG
The states that ratified the amendment back when did so in light of societal norms of the day. [read post]