Search for: "Discover Bank v. Johnson" Results 81 - 100 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
" And when they pat 'em down, lo and behold, they discover a loaded .25. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 04, 2008 US v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:24 am
The jury could have inferred from this evidence that Tran knew the checks were counterfeit and had reason to believe that the credit union would discover the theft.Tran v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
He said she consented and it was only when it was discovered who she had had sex with that it became rape. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Guerrero , No. 06-2745 Conviction for aiding and abetting an armed bank robbery and the use and carrying of firearms in relation to that offense is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) his post-arrest statements were obtained in violation of Miranda; 2) the underlying evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; and 3) evidence of his two prior bank robberies should have been excluded under Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Smalley, No. 06-4552 A sentence for bank robbery is vacated and remanded for resentencing where: 1) the district court erred in applying a four-level enhancement for "otherwise us[ing]" a dangerous weapon during the course of a bank robbery, as opposed to a three-level enhancement for "brandish[ing] or possess[ing]" a dangerous weapon; and 2) the error was not harmless despite the district court's attempt to amend its judgment after the sentencing hearing… [read post]