Search for: "District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board" Results 81 - 100 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
For example, there is a recent prohibition in the Netherlands on non-compete clauses in fixed-term contracts unless justified by the special interests of the company. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Murphy Oil could have sought review in (1) the circuit where the unfair labor practice allegedly took place, (2) any circuit in which Murphy Oil transacts business, or (3) the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. 29 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
He has not only tried discrimination suits before federal juries, he has also briefed and argued discrimination appeals before the Fifth and Tenth Circuit Courts of Appeal, and briefed appeals before the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
Manning, 14-1132; and Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  *************************************   Every board now knows its company will fall victim to a cyber-attack, and even worse, that the board will need to clean up the mess and superintend the fallout. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm by Katharyn Grant (US)
District Court for the District of Columbia granted summary judgment to the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards (CFP Board), on a Lanham Act false advertising claim brought by plaintiffs alleging that the CFP Board unfairly enforced its disciplinary rules against them. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Such bylaws are considered “flexible contracts” with shareholders that allow the board to change or add bylaws without interfering with any “vested rights” of shareholders. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court affirmed dismissal of her claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and dealing, and negligent supervision (Brown v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am by Ben
Leon in the District of Columbia has approved the Sirius' motion to stay the lawsuit from SoundExchange to await the decision of a hearing with the federal Copyright Royalty Board - the body that sets the statutory rates that Sirius XM must pay - and if these can include revenues purportedly attributable to performances of pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
The hospitals have appealed a March 30, 2013, ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The United States District Court for the District of Columbia agreed and dismissed the Plaintiffs complaints. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in June 2012, Central District of California Judge R. [read post]