Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
The first university case involving affirmative action was in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
In 1989's Doe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Ever since Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Regents of the University of California, 8 Cal.App.3d 1, 13 (1970): A difference of medical opinion concerning the desirability of one particular medical procedure over another does not ... establish that the determination to use one of the procedures was negligent. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 12:52 am
Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85, 101-103 (1984) ("NCAA"). [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 4:30 am
Regents of the University of California imposed a duty on a mental health professional to warn a prospective victim about the risk posed by a dangerous patient. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
In Doe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1023, 1032-1033.) [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Board of Regents of University of Colorado (D. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm
The Regents of the University of California (Collegiate Housing Foundation, American Campus Communities, et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2021) _____ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
By Guest Bloggers Margaret Chon and Christine Haight Farley [Margaret Chon is a Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law, and Christine Haight Farley is a Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law.] [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Past decisions in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm
§ 1623; (2) whether a court must undertake conflict preemption analysis after concluding that an express preemption provision does not apply in a case involving both types of preemption claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (California Supreme Court)Petition for certiorariBrief of the Regents of the University of California et al. in oppositionBrief of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges et al. in… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Regents of The University of California (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1043 is instructive. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 2:37 pm
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
The Regents of the University of California (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 227: The EIR for projects located within the southeast quadrant of the U.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
Board of Regents, the Supreme Court further declared that academic freedom "is a special concern of the First Amendment, which does not tolerate laws that cast a pall of orthodoxy over the classroom. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
Regents of the University of California, 271 Cal. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
