Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco… [read post]
(D068185; 4  Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  The Court opined that the statutory exemption “endorsed the approach of the First District” in another CEQA “parking impacts” case, San Francisco Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]