Search for: "Does 1 - 107" Results 81 - 100 of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The appellate court said in part:[The trial court] correctly held that Yeshiva does not meet the definition of "religious corporation incorporated under the education law or the religious corporation law," which would exempt it from the prohibitions against discrimination in public accommodations as an organization "deemed to be . . . distinctly private" (Administrative Code of City of NY §§ 8-102, 8-107[4][a][1][a])....Turning to… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:57 pm by Daniel Shaviro
 Determining the Revenue Payoff – Again, the paper offers a rough ballpark estimate of $107 billion in IRS budget increases (over 10 years) as raising tax revenues by over $1 trillion. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:47 pm
Please provide the following information for each of the B3 transactions listed in Appendix "A": 1. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:47 pm
Please provide the following information for each of the B3 transactions listed in Appendix "A": 1. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 10:03 pm by Anna Gelpern
Mark posted a lucid analysis of Ukraine's loss to Russia in London yesterday (full 107-pp opinion here). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 11:53 am by PJ Blount
McClung,The Art of Military Discovery: Chinese Air and Space Power Implications for the USAF 36, Strategic Studies Quarterly, v. 4, no. 1, p. 36 (2010) Reports Aviation Safety: Preliminary Information on Aircraft Icing and Winter Operations, by Gerald L. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:37 am by Mark Astarita
 Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million. [read post]
27 May 2021, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
ISBN 978-1-107-17963-9 (hardcover) $126.95; ISBN 978-1-316-63141-6 (softcover) $40.95. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:53 am by Susan Brenner
Lee, 214 I11.2d 476  (Illinois Supreme Court 2005) (quoting 725 ILCS 5/107–2(1)(c)). [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Hence, the provisions of R 99(1)(c) are met. [2.4] The board concludes that the appeal by [opponent 2] is admissible since it meets all requirements set out in A 106, A 107 EPC 1973 and A 108, as well as in R 97 and R 99. [read post]