Search for: "Does 1 - 198" Results 81 - 100 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2015, 9:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
The defendants then contended that even if the individual plaintiffs may use Town Law § 268(2) to seek enforcement of this portion of Town Code § 198–21.2(F)(1)(b), it may not be enforced because the Town lacked the authority to regulate who owns or occupies land. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:02 am by Roel van Woudenberg
T 1946/15 - 3.2.02 en date du 19 octobre 2016 et T 198/16 – 3.5.04 en date du 20 mars 2018 - Courant jurisprudentiel dit « majoritaire »II Observations des tiersB MOTIFS DE L'AVISI Recevabilité de la saisine1. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The board does not accept this argument because the above citations simply disclose that aluminum is not incorporated into the silica network, what however does not constitute evidence that an improved glassiness was not obtained. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:45 pm by Sam Turco
 I would estimate that only about 1 in 3 of those folks who begin this program become debt free. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:26 am by Ruth Levush
(CPC art. 198, para. 1; see also sec. 3 of summary of 1993 (O) 1189 (S. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The decision discusses alleged conflicting or at least diverging application of G 1/92, as well as G 1/92 itself, in detail. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:23 am
See Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Lanham Act; In re Boston Beer Co., L.P., 198 F.3d 1370, 53 USPQ2d 1056, 1058 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” It is true that document D2 does not disclose a specific range defined by specific upper and lower limits, but by referring to structures of the order of nanometres or microns and by referring to the substrates as being micro-structured substrates it defines a range of dimensions that is limited to such microstructures.The impugned decision invoked the principle of selection inventions by applying the three criteria of decision T 198/84 [7]. [read post]