Search for: "Does 1-152"
Results 81 - 100
of 870
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Ex. 4 at 1. 151. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On this account, legislative delegation to the executive creates a principal-agent relationship.[1] Courts conduct judicial review to ensure that the administration acts a proper agent, staying within the confines of its legislatively-granted authority. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:06 pm
Under this structure, then, a Member: 1) may take a measure that is necessary to protect public morals, for example, but only if 2) that measure does not arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminate or constitute a disguised restriction on trade. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
This post does not criticize or endorse that argument. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
AB 152 does not provide any additional or new leave to current employees. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:18 pm
The extension of the 2022 COVID Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Law does not create new banks of leave for employees and does not change the reasons for which an employee may take leave. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm
AB 152 does not change the qualifying reasons for SPSL. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:10 pm
Significantly, AB 152 does not credit employees with additional COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave hours. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 11:47 am
Importantly, the bill does not create additional leave, and there is no new entitlement to leave, Hoffman says. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
Univ., No. 1:19-cv-02204 (S.D. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 1:12 pm
AB 152: COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (Again) The 2022 COVID-19 SPSL law was set to sunset on September 30, 2022—because of this bill, it did not. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm
The bill does not create the right for the employee to be impaired while at work, does not apply to the b [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:54 am
Although AB 152 does extend the availability of SPSL through December 31, 2022, it doesn’t increase an employee’s leave entitlement. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 8:42 am
Co., 152 Ariz. 600 (1987), another insurance bad faith case. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 8:42 am
Co., 152 Ariz. 600 (1987), another insurance bad faith case. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:46 am
Please note, the physician responsible for collaborating with a mid-level practitioner does not have the practitioner’s “supervising physician” for incident to billing purposes. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:27 pm
The ordinance does not provide any other opportunities for an employer to require or request documentation of a need for PHEL. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 7:48 am
152! [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:12 am
AB 152: COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Relief AB 152 would establish a grant program within the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development to assist qualified small businesses and non-profits which have incurred costs for COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave for its employees. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:08 pm
This Friday’s Five highlights five key bills that California employers need to monitor: 1. [read post]
