Search for: "Does 1-24"
Results 81 - 100
of 16,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2018, 8:37 am
Please direct questions to the District Office **UPDATE No. 1** The lanes are now open. 3989 / 3490 ****End of update**** Original news release, 24 Jan 2018, 4:30 p.m. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Legislatures Coming Into Session Utah 1/23/12 Minnesota 1/24/12 Committee Activity of Note January 23 South Dakota House Judiciary Committee HB 1064 Allows the Supreme Court to establish certain rules for the use of interactive audio visual equipment and to provide for the collection and deposit of fees for the use thereof. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:20 am
App. 3d 24, 29-30 (1993)). [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:51 am
TRA Global, Inc., 1-11-cv-04039 (NYSD June 24, 2016, Order) (Forrest, J.) [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:11 am
Earlier episodes include:The IPKat's DSM Directive SeriesDSM Directive Series #1: Do Member States have to transpose the value gap provision and does the YouTube referral matter? [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The fact that the individually named defendants were not DOE officers is irrelevant with respect to the issue of whether DOE is within the ambit of §3813(1) notice of claim requirement. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The fact that the individually named defendants were not DOE officers is irrelevant with respect to the issue of whether DOE is within the ambit of §3813(1) notice of claim requirement. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:59 am
Independent claims 1 and 9 of the main request, filed on 6 June 2019, read:1. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 6:31 am
On November 24, 2020, the Board held that a high-level executive’s tweet violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA by interfering with or restraining employees’ protected, concerted activity. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 3:49 pm
Letter 24-19-1 (Sept. 13, 2019). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:10 am
At issue in Doe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:58 pm
California Eminent Domain Law Group’s Glenn Block will be speaking at the IRWA Chapter 1 Annual Valuation Seminar on April 24, 2012. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:06 am
Lacking a definition, the CJEU has sought to determine the meaning and scope thereof in light of the objectives pursued by the InfoSoc Directive, notably that of ensuring a high level of protection of intellectual property (recital 24). [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:16 am
Does 1-22, Dkt No. 07-00057. [read post]
24 May 2013, 4:00 am
Dist.of the City of N.Y. v Mulgrew, 2013 NY Slip Op 03580, Appellate Division, First Department The New York City Department of Education (DOE) had filed a plan seeking to close 24 “underperforming schools” and to subsequently reopen 24 "new" schools at the identical locations and facilities with the State Department of Education (SED), which conditionally approved the plan. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
The case, Doe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:19 pm
On November 24, 2009, the Court of Appeals published a 2-1 opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
” First of all the board notes that claim 1 reads: “wherein said dose is repeatedly administered in a dosage interval of once every 24 hours” and does not read “repeatedly once every 24 hours”. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall. 2, 123-24 (1866). [read post]
