Search for: "Does 1-53" Results 81 - 100 of 3,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Letter 1 is signed by former DEA administrators and Directors of National Drug Policy. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
She stated that she was the primary driver and that her boyfriend does not drive the Cadillac. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, the Court of Appeal made clear that the caselaw on bare comment does not prescribe an inflexible rule compelling a court to treat a statement of opinion as if it were fact where the opinion implies that a claimant has done something but does not indicate what that something is [24]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The judgment helpfully walks through the existing case law, including in particular the Court of Appeal decision in Evans v Cig Mon Cymru [2008] 1 WLR 2675, on when an amendment falls to be considered under CPR 17.4 rather than CPR 17.1 ([46]-[52]). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
  Therefore the state court decision in this case does not, as far as I can tell, affect whether Trump appears on the November ballot.) [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Marcel Pemsel
Comment The judgment appears to be in line with the CJEU’s previous case law on the burden of proof for the conditions of exhaustion: 1. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:58 am by Laura
It is important for couples to understand that cohabitation does not automatically create the same legal rights as marriage. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Rev. 53, 55 (1878), https://www.jstor.org/stable/i25110155; Editor, 'Interesting Decision as to Disqualification Under the Fourteenth Amendment,' [Richmond, Virginia] Daily Dispatch, Mar. 5, 1869, at 3; 'Does the Fourteenth Amendment Exclude the Disqualified from a State Legislature,' Wheeling [West Virginia] Daily Register, Aug. 30, 1871, at 4; 'Does the Fourteenth Amendment Exclude the Disqualified from a State Legislature,' [Richmond,… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
During his tenure, the Commission adopted a very significant and impactful regulation — rule 146 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).[1] If rule 146 does not ring a bell, do not worry. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Title II does not create a right to information. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:06 am by Matthias Weller
(2) If so, would Art. 53 of the EU Charter allow higher standards under the domestic law of the Member State as assessed by the Spanish Constitutional Court[1] for service of process? [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
For example, CAS 403 addresses the allocation of home office costs to business segments,[23] and CAS 410 governs the allocation of business unit G&A to final cost objectives.[24] CAS 418, the focus here, applies to the extent any other provision of the CAS does not require a different allocation.[25] The purpose of CAS 418 is to provide criteria for “the consistent determination of direct and indirect costs,” “the accumulation of indirect costs … in indirect… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Petitioner did not comply with these requirements; as a result, she was placed on unpaid administrative leave on September 27, 2021.The NYSDOH regulations at issue expired on June 1, 2022. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Petitioner did not comply with these requirements; as a result, she was placed on unpaid administrative leave on September 27, 2021.The NYSDOH regulations at issue expired on June 1, 2022. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:05 am by Yuval Shany
In this essay, we address three aspects of the case, which were central to the hearings: (1) the different ways in which the parties framed the events that have transpired in Gaza after the massacre of October 7 committed by Hamas inside Israel; (2) the battle over the request to suspend the Israeli military operation – which might be the real raison d’être for the South African application; and (3) the relationships between the different conditions for issuing provisional… [read post]