Search for: "Does 1-57" Results 81 - 100 of 2,995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Non-director initiated, 92 were not instituted, 140 instituted; 19 partial cancellation and 57 full cancellation. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Cabinet Office rejected the request, invoking section 12(1) of FIPPA. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, the Court of Appeal made clear that the caselaw on bare comment does not prescribe an inflexible rule compelling a court to treat a statement of opinion as if it were fact where the opinion implies that a claimant has done something but does not indicate what that something is [24]. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, s.1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 means that claimants now have to prove that the publication caused, or was likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Moab Partners LP,[1] a closely followed case that ought to address whether a purported failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Gesa Kübek
As Bulgaria is not a member of the Istanbul Convention, recital 17 of the Qualification Directive does not aid qualifying the Convention as ‘relevant’ under Article 78(1) TFEU. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1]  (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
See, e.g., America's Constitution: A Biography 170-73, 556-57 (2006); Akhil Amar, America's Unwritten Constitution 17-19, 404 (2012); see also Akhil Amar, The Words That Made Us 472-465 (2021). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm by Guest Author
It’s not entirely clear which of these two positions Carr and Simington take, but there are some indications that they believe HB20 does trigger intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"*The Commissioner ruled that Petitioner's appeal must be dismissed and the application denied.The Commissioner noted that an appeal to the Commissioner is appellate in nature and does not provide for investigations and that the Commissioner has no authority to award monetary damages, costs or reimbursements in an appeal pursuant to Education Law §310 , citing Appeal of D.B., 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,244 and Application of Kolbmann, 48 id. 370, Decision No.… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"*The Commissioner ruled that Petitioner's appeal must be dismissed and the application denied.The Commissioner noted that an appeal to the Commissioner is appellate in nature and does not provide for investigations and that the Commissioner has no authority to award monetary damages, costs or reimbursements in an appeal pursuant to Education Law §310 , citing Appeal of D.B., 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,244 and Application of Kolbmann, 48 id. 370, Decision No.… [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 7:45 am by Anna Maria Stein
The GC replied that “The disclosure of an earlier design within the meaning of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 does not, as such, constitute a fact within the meaning of Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002, but the ‘result of a factual assessment’, EUIPO being required to examine all evidence submitted in order to establish whether it actually proves disclosure of the earlier design” (para 87) and that “the disclosure of an earlier… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Maria Magierska
For example, in some Member States, the complainant does not have the status of a party to the proceedings. [read post]