Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 81 - 100
of 23,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2024, 11:15 am
Despite the basic principles that a patent does not presume market power and does establish plenary legality within its issued scope, as we learned in Part I of this two-part series, the Federal Trade Commission can and has used threats of antitrust inquiries to coerce patent owners to voluntarily forego some activities within the scope of a patent’s right to exclude. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
I. [read post]
25 May 2024, 8:50 am
Evid. 901(a) There is almost nothing that can happen in an Illinois divorce hearing or trial that does not require a witness. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
As she noted, “[w]hen the Constitution’s text does not provide a limit to a coordinate branch’s power, we should not lightly assume that Article III implicitly directs the Judiciary to find one. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:40 pm
The order is most naturally read to mean that Israel must immediately halt (i) its military offensive in the Rafah Governorate, and (ii) any other action in the Rafah Governorate which may inflict on the Palestinian group in Gaza conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:00 am
So much so that I was surprised to learn the that the legal industry was still ranked third in a study on industries with the most confusing jargon[ii]. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Nonetheless, this partiality does not exclude some similarity in essence and consequence. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:05 pm
” The FCC reclassified these access services as telecommunication services as defined in Title II of the Communications Act. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 pm
Yet Brazil does not mean to step into the role of opponent, in the style of Cuba. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
II. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
II. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
That does not mean that I approve of the practice as a policy matter, but the question, in my view, rests with a president in using the authority granted under Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, which defines the pardon power as allowing a president to “grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
In relation to (i) and (ii), Nicoventures submitted that the arguments and evidence presented at the UPC might influence both the outcome and the scheduling of the EPO proceedings. [read post]
21 May 2024, 7:58 pm
HHS found that while marijuana is associated with a high prevalence of abuse of nonmedical use, epidemiological indicators suggest that the drug does not produce negative outcomes as serious as those compared with schedule I or II drugs. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:05 pm
In Laborem Exercens (1981), Pope Saint John Paul II focuses on work from a personalist perspective, writing that work is “probably the essential key to the whole social question. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:49 pm
It does not fully consider restrictions on types of uses (e.g. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:27 pm
” The Court dismissed plaintiff’s claims under Section 631(a) based in large part on its determinations that (i) using a cell phone’s web browser does not constitute a “telephonic communication” and (ii) the alleged code was not necessarily used to intercept customer communications “while”they were “in transit,” rather than to store such communications after they were received by Boscov’s. [read post]
21 May 2024, 10:46 am
As summarized in our blog post analyzing the Prior Notice, which may be found here, the Domestic Content Bonus Requirements are satisfied if (i) 100% of any steel or iron that is a component of a project was produced in the United States (the “Steel or Iron Requirement”), (ii) at least the adjusted percentage (which differs based on when construction of a project begins and the type of project, but for most projects is 40% if construction begins this year) of… [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
In resisting the application for a preliminary injunction, Hanshow argued that (i) claim features 1.1, 7 and 8.4 were not realised in the contested products, (ii) SES had not proved that Hanshow had offered or marketed these products, and (iii) EP 277 was invalid on the basis of obviousness and lack of novelty. [read post]
