Search for: "Du Pont v. Du Pont" Results 81 - 100 of 568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
" The Board concluded that this first du Pont factor "weighs somewhat in favor of a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361 (C.C.P.A. 1973).Under the doctrine of foreign equivalents, foreign words from common languages are translated into English to determine similarity of connotation with English word marks. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
” The Board thus concluded that the marks have similar connotations that create similar commercial impressions.Conclusion: Weighing the Du Pont factors, the Board concluded that confusion between the parties’ marks is likely.And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Is this a WYHA? [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 9:37 am by Nikki Siesel
In a recent reversal by the Board, emphasis was placed on the importance of du Pont factor number six; see In re Simpson Industries, Inc., Serial No. 87635385 (October 7, 2019) [not precedential]. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 10:02 am by William K. Berenson
Merrell Dow Pharms. and the Texas Supreme Court  in E.I. du Pont de Nemours v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:09 am
Cir. 1983).Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found a likelihood of confusion.Laches: Tru's affirmative defense of laches fell flat. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:59 pm by Nikki Siesel
Cir. 2002), where the Federal Circuit held that the Board erred since it did not consider the intent-to-use application and cited registrations as evidence under the second du Pont factor. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 2:44 am
The National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’is of the United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Although the involved services are related, the first du Pont factor, the dissimilarities between the marks, was dispositive. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:20 am
” The Board therefore concluded that the second and third du Pont factors favored the USPTO.Similarity of the marks/commercial impression: Citing the Federal Circuit’s decision in Stone Lion Capital Partners v. [read post]