Search for: "Duke v. Georgia" Results 81 - 100 of 187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Mandy Cooper, Duke University, “A House of Cards: Familial Economic Networks and the State in Antebellum North Carolina. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:43 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
The connection with Georgia State is mostly found in the fact that the opinion in Katz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:52 am by Karen Hoffmann
Her first post will discuss the S.A.S. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:36 pm
At the blog "Scholarly Communications @ Duke," Kevin Smith has a post titled "A reversal for Georgia State. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Georgia, but also that a member of the public was actually excluded from the courtroom. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:04 pm by Ron Miller
A deputy police chief at a public university, who was demoted after posting the image of a Confederate flag on his Facebook page was barred from proceeding with his First Amendment retaliation claims, a federal district court in Georgia ruled in Duke v Hamil. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:04 pm by Ron Miller
A deputy police chief at a public university, who was demoted after posting the image of a Confederate flag on his Facebook page was barred from proceeding with his First Amendment retaliation claims, a federal district court in Georgia ruled in Duke v Hamil. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
  These include Connecticut, Georgia, Kentucky, and most recently Texas. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:30 pm by Bridget Crawford
  Lisa Milot (Georgia), Larry Zelenak (Duke), Paul Stephan (Virginia) and I weighed in with different perspectives on the tax consequences of the transfers at issue in Perez v. [read post]