Search for: "Dunlop v. State" Results 81 - 93 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Supp. 2d 1063: Question: did DMV.org create confusion about affiliation with a state agency? [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:26 am by Michelle Yeary
  Plaintiffs seemed to think that this fact alone was sufficient to confer jurisdiction under Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:30 am by GuestPost
Director of Public Prosecutions v Deirdre Clancy, Nuin Dunlop, Karen Fallon, Damien Moran, & Ciaron O’Reilly, On July 25th 2006, a Jury in Dublin Circuit Criminal Court voted unanimously to acquit five people charged with criminal damage to a US military transport plane at Shannon Airport. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
  In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
The current state of the CSDDD already represents a milestone. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Pepper Hilton Hotels Black & Decker Dunlop Tires IBM Braum’s Inc. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164], in which the High Court was considering a similar question as to whether the Election Tribunal constituted under the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, had the power to pass an injunction so as to restrain an elected representative from assuming office pending adjudication of an election petition filed against him. [read post]