Search for: "Dupree v. Dupree" Results 81 - 100 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” In order to establish liability under section 487, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted with intent to deceive him or her or the court (see Gillen v McCarron, 126 AD3d 670, 671 [2015]; Cullin v Spiess, 122 AD3d 792, 793 [2014]; Dupree v Voorhees, 102 AD3d 912, 913 [2013]). [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rather, “the only liability standard recognized in Judiciary Law §487 is that of an intent to deceive” (Dupree v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 7:00 pm by Jon Katz
Latron Dupree Brown’s plight is the Virginia appellate courts’ latest consideration of protective sweeps and home search warrants. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"[M]ere speculation about a loss resulting from an attorney's alleged omission is insufficient to sustain a prima facie case of legal malpractice" (Siciliano v Forchelli & Forchelli, 17 AD3d 343, 345; see Dupree v Voorhees, 68 AD3d 810, 812-813; Plymouth Org., Inc. v Silverman, Collura & Chernis, P.C., 21 AD3d 464; Giambrone v Bank of N.Y., 253 AD2d 786). [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A chronic extreme pattern of legal delinquency is not a basis for liability pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Dupree v Voorhees, 102 AD3d 912, 913). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "In order to prevail in an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish both that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, resulting in actual damages to the plaintiff, and that "but for" the attorney's negligence, the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits in the underlying action or not have sustained any damages (Dupree… [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Collins v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rather, “the only liability standard recognized in Judiciary Law §487 is that of an intent to deceive” (Dupree v . [read post]