Search for: "Duval v. Duval"
Results 81 - 100
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue,… [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent ltd, heard 10 October 2019. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:06 am
However, the Florida Supreme Court has now decided as recently as May 13, 2009, in the case of Embry v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Duvall, Chasing Moseley's Ghost: Dilution Surveys Under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act, 98 TMR 1311 (November - December 2008).The MoseleysStacey L. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:50 am
In Greenwood and Rice v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:43 am
Source: Duvall v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Murphy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:20 am
Duval County, (University of Miami Law Review, 2009).Kenneth George Leonczyk, RLUIPA and Eminent Domain: How a Plain Reading of a Flawed Statute Creates an Absurd Result, (Texas Review of Law & Politics, Vol. 13, 2009).From SmartCILP:Martha C. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am
Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent ltd, heard 10 October 2019. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
At the time of the comencement of this proceeding in Housing Court, plaintiff was represented by Kaplain & Duval LLP. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:37 pm
In STMicroelectronics N.V. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
Unanimous Decision: Justices Marshall, Washington, Todd, Duvall, and Story (Justice Thompson abstained)Ruling: As interstate navigation fell under interstate commerce, New York could not interfere with it, and the law was therefore invalid.Circumstances of Gibbons v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:01 pm
One of the first and certainly the most noted case in this line is Sabella v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:11 am
It relied upon the Vanderlinde, Blum, Duvall and Roberts cases for the proposition that misappropriation of funds by an attorney will result in the disbarment of an attorney in the absence of compelling extenuating circumstances justifying a lesser sanction, and that no such circumstances are present here.The court disagreed, noting that the circumstances in this case were much less egregious than in the other cases, that McCulloch had admitted to her wrong conduct without making excuses,… [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:58 pm
During voir dire in Hojan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Brady v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:12 am
Klen v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
Duvall, 886 P.2d 1252 (Cal. 1995). [read post]
