Search for: "E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company" Results 81 - 100 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
    The facts and procedural history in the case indicate that for an extended period of time, DuPont's plant discharged perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) into the environment surrounding the Parkersburg City Water Department plant. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:10 am by Mike Scarcella
There, Kolon is defending against trade secrets claims that a rival company, E.I. du Pont de Nemours, filed in February 2009. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Beth Graham
DuPont de Nemours & Company (collectively, “DuPont”). [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:37 am by Jenna Greene
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. has agreed to pay $3.3 million to settle charges by the Environmental Protection Agency that the company failed to immediately report research showing certain chemicals could pose a substantial risk to human health... [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:05 am by Carter Wood
DuPont De Nemours, striking all of DuPont's defenses in a case alleging that a formulation of the company's fungicide Benlate(TM) harmed part of the shrimp population in Ecuador in the early 1990s. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
DuPont de Nemours and Company to review environmental safety procedures at its industrial plant in Belle, W. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am by Beck/Herrmann
You've got a court in California, but nobody else, allowing "misrepresentation" liability for a brand-name company in a generic drug case. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
The removing defendant, a diverse drug company (of course!) [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
DuPont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE - Senior Paralegal in IP and Commercial Litigation department2. [read post]
July 3, 2009 - Opinions ReleasedTEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDERS JUDGES TO EXPLAIN AND JUSTIFY WHY THEY GRANTED NEW TRIALS [in cases in which tort claim defendants had prevailed with the jury]"In the Interest of Justice" - a common label for judicial discretion in that regard and in others - will no longer pass muster as a sufficient ground. [read post]