Search for: "ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 81 - 100 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2017, 11:07 am by Andrew Keane Woods
  Background The dispute arose when the Justice Department brought a warrant to Microsoft –  issued based upon probable cause under the SCA (18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 12:46 pm by John Floyd
  The Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) reported recently that in 2016 the government filed 1,485 applications for FISA surveillance, either electronic surveillance or physical searches. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
An amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court (at the Court’s request) by the Department of Justice noted that “actuarial risk assessments” had been used in trials since 1923, and the National Center for State Courts favoured their use. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Alex Potcovaru
Andrew Keane Woods wrote that the simplest solution to the cross-border data problems would be to remove the blocking features of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
Laura Donohue is a Professor of Law, and Director of the Center on National Security and the Law, and Director of the Center on Privacy and Technology at the Georgetown University Law School. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
”  It directed each relevant “department and agency . . . [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers
The security team then forwarded the complaint, image, and Susan_14’s profile information—email address, home address, and date that the Playstation account was opened—to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:50 am by Lisa Daniels
Evidently, the Justice Department has been asking judges outside the Second Circuit to reject this ruling. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm by Orin Kerr
Even though the retrieval of the electronic data by Google from its multiple data centers abroad has the potential for an invasion of privacy, the actual infringement of privacy occurs at the time of disclosure in the United States. [read post]
Safe Harbour agreement which was invalidated on October 6, 2015, by the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
Safe Harbour agreement which was invalidated on October 6, 2015, by the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:53 pm by Shahid Buttar
We also joined coalition comments compiled by the Center for Democracy & Technology, as well as a second set of coalition comments organized by the Brennan Center for Justice in response to a DHS notice required by the Privacy Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The device at issue is an iPhone 5c, used by Syed Rizwan Farook, who with his wife, Tashfeen Malik, opened fire during a holiday party at the Inland Regional Center in the San Bernardino massacre, killing 14 people and injuring 22 others. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    For instance, after suffering a cyber-attack, a corporation must not only bear the substantial regulatory and litigation costs associated with potential privacy violations – that is just the tip of the iceberg. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:37 am by Timothy Edgar
 The Electronic Privacy Information Center has urged broader reforms. [read post]