Search for: "EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY &C. v. Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 8:00 am
Terry Smith, et al. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am
Definition of employer/employee—SCt seems to follow my lead by looking at the Restatement of Agency for vicarious liability. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who has received a PAGA letter may potentially avoid liability by immediately reviewing its wage statements to ensure compliance. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who has received a PAGA letter may potentially avoid liability by immediately reviewing its wage statements to ensure compliance. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who has received a PAGA letter may potentially avoid liability by immediately reviewing its wage statements to ensure compliance. [read post]
Creating circuit split, 11th Circuit finds ADEA authorizes disparate impact claims by job applicants
2 Dec 2015, 6:10 am
On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit noted that in Smith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
He writes that, unlike agencies, which can choose any reasonable interpretation of ambiguous text: [c]ourts . . . must give the statute its single, most plausible, reading. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Appellants sued appellees on several theories of liability including barratry. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Appellants sued appellees on several theories of liability including barratry. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
” Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
On 22 July 2012, in accordance with the Service Agreement, the fifth pursuer gave the defender twelve months notice of the termination of his employment. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:29 am
See e.g., Pfeil v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Smith 13-946Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit failed to apply the deferential standard of review required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
Smith, THE SMITH APPELLATE LAW FIRM, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Drouillard. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Downing v. [read post]
