Search for: "EPA v. California"
Results 81 - 100
of 682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 8:35 am
Scott Pruitt, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency, No. 17-1145, opinion July 3, 2017; State of California, et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm
However, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm
However, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Envt'l Protection Agency, No. 09-71414 (Feb. 2, 2011) The case involves whether the EPA properly approved revisions to California's State Implementation Plan for meeting air quality standards for ozone under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:47 pm
California is considering a similar law that will undoubtedly be less lenient. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:58 am
These regulations face preemption problems, an issue that California has tried to address through a long-neglected waiver request to the EPA. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:07 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:07 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
Welcome to California, North Dakota. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:05 pm
See Bridewell-Sledge, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:29 pm
That case, Rapanos v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
California v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
After the decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
Iowa has approved two permits while California, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Utah, and Wisconsin have issued one each. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:40 pm
EPA, Halliburton v. [read post]
