Search for: "EPA v. California"
Results 81 - 100
of 680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm
However, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Envt'l Protection Agency, No. 09-71414 (Feb. 2, 2011) The case involves whether the EPA properly approved revisions to California's State Implementation Plan for meeting air quality standards for ozone under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:47 pm
California is considering a similar law that will undoubtedly be less lenient. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:58 am
These regulations face preemption problems, an issue that California has tried to address through a long-neglected waiver request to the EPA. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:07 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:07 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:05 pm
See Bridewell-Sledge, et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
Welcome to California, North Dakota. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:29 pm
That case, Rapanos v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
California v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
After the decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
Iowa has approved two permits while California, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Utah, and Wisconsin have issued one each. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:40 pm
EPA, Halliburton v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of California granted summary judgment for the Plaintiffs in National Association of Wheat Growers et. al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:29 am
If EPA's press release is any indication of what it will say in its formal denial of the petition, it looks like it is going to bungle this as badly it did the petition at issue in Massachusetts v. [read post]