Search for: "Economou v. Little"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
They’d look for some little snippet of text in the Lanham Act; Scalia was a textualist but he could read a law in its entirety. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
Last July, in Missouri v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
(The Dance of Debt and the Stability of Strategic Economic Misery: Cuba (Again) Restructures its (Unpayable) Foreign Debt). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
., Lochner v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Larue v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:23 am
The leading case Labar v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
United States and, most recently, in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Hanover Star v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:34 pm
In reggaeton’s early years, the genre had little economic value. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
There is really very little here; and that is what ought to give pause. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
Supreme Court’s 1962 decision in Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
The court held that the FTC had applied the wrong legal standard in evaluating Illumina’s “open offer” (see me here; Alden Abbott here and here; Jonathan Barnett here; and the International Center for Law & Economics’ (ICLE) amicus brief here). [read post]
