Search for: "England v. Parke"
Results 81 - 100
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 6:08 am
’ Parks ignored the call and went back to sleep. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 8:44 am
However, a landmark 2010 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Papadopoulos v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:33 am
En route to their destinations, the first container was allegedly hijacked in Belgium, whilst the majority of the cigarette cartons in the second container had 18 pallets worth of tobacco stolen while the vehicle was parked. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
Idaho's state park system will celebrate its centennial this year. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:30 am
Lee: The Supreme Court Case that Influenced the Play “A Raisin in the Sun” An Interview with Seongryeol (Ryan) Park, Foreign Law Intern Chew Heong v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:52 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
It concerns a British mother who took her children from Norway and travelled to England unbeknown to their Norwegian father who later made an application to the Central Authority in Norway for the children to be returned which was granted by Pauffley J in November 2010. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:33 pm
See Thompson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:10 am
The curious case of Tweedie v Park Travel Agency (Pty) Ltd t/a Park Tours 1998 (4) SA 802 (W) illustrates the principle. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/06/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern… [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/07/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard 14th-15th December 2022 Smith and another v Royal Bank of Scotland, heard 12th January… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Over the weekend I wrote about Lodi v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 29/04/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
It also noted that the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Your Response v Datateam Business Media [2014] EWCA Civ 281 had taken a contrary view in holding that digital files constituting a database were not property. [read post]
