Search for: "Estate of Miner" Results 81 - 100 of 773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2023, 12:41 pm by John McFarland
The exemption applies to the following types of charitable organizations who provide services without regard to ability to pay, but only if the mineral or royalty interest (i) is not severed from the surface estate (i.e., is under land owned by the charity), or (ii) was donated to the charity: a charity providing medical care; Continue reading → [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:40 am by Charles Sartain
 Leonor’s bequest conveyed a life estate in only the surface of Las Piedras Ranch; her undivided interest in the 7,016 mineral acres passed in the residuary of her estate equally to her three children. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:44 am
The mineral estate is the "dominant estate," meaning that the owner of the mineral estate has the right to use so much of the surface estate as is reasonably necessary for exploration and development of the minerals, without compensation to the surface owner for such use. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 2:27 pm by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Dormant Mineral Interests Act — Transfer of vested property rights This case arises from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Garrett County, terminating appellants’ dormant mineral interests and merging them into appellees’ surface estates. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:37 am by Jayne Sykora
The rights in the bundle may be separated and held by different parties, like mineral rights or water rights, for example. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 9:22 am
Real Estate Agents & Brokers Real estate agents and brokers must be licensed by the State of Michigan. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by Steven M. Regan
Mineral Deed• A deed conveying all or any part of the subsurface mineral estate is subject to Pennsylvania transfer tax. [read post]
23 May 2017, 5:20 am by Charles Sartain
There’s always an exception The court left open the possibility that a mineral owner could prevent pass-through drilling if it can show that such activity would either (i) unreasonably interfere with the mineral estate owner’s development of the estate or (ii) remove or destroy a sizeable quantum of minerals. [read post]
23 May 2017, 5:20 am by Charles Sartain
There’s always an exception The court left open the possibility that a mineral owner could prevent pass-through drilling if it can show that such activity would either (i) unreasonably interfere with the mineral estate owner’s development of the estate or (ii) remove or destroy a sizeable quantum of minerals. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:15 am by Charles Sartain
A severed fraction of a royalty interest such as an NPRI generally would burden the entire mineral estate because it necessarily limits the royalty interest attached to the underlying mineral interests. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 5:21 am by Charles Sartain
Eventually, the mineral estates became severed from the surface. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:26 pm by Harry Styron
The real estate contract stated clearly that the minerals were not to be conveyed. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 11:12 pm
Both Lesley and the accommodation doctrine are in some ways erosions of the traditional Texas rule that the mineral estate is the dominant estate. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 2:35 pm by John McFarland
The solar array covers 70% of the surface above the Lyles’ mineral estate. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:40 pm by Alexander Suarez
”  The Court noted that while valuation of a mineral estate is inherently difficult, and to some degree speculative, that doesn’t preclude the mineral estate from having and ascertainable market value. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:24 am by Steve Clowney
Bret Wells (Houston) has posted The Dominant Mineral Estate in the Horizontal Well Context: Time to Extend Moser Horizontally (Houston Law Review) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
One cannot exercise their rights to the exclusion of the other; however, if the mineral lessee has acted unreasonably, excessively, or without reasonable regard for the landowner’s concurrent right of use of the land under the lease, then the landowner of the servient estate may seek redress to restore their right of use. [read post]