Search for: "Eugene Scalia"
Results 81 - 100
of 369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2007, 4:14 pm
As Justice Scalia explained in Young v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 2:53 pm
The following are selected excerpts from a Washington Post ensemble piece published on April 10, 2020, and entitled: Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia faces blowback as he curtails scope of worker relief in unemployment crisis:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Eugene Scalia - C'mon, ManIn recent days, Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia, who has expressed concerns about unemployment insurance being… [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:11 am
(Eugene Volokh) So the Court just held in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) An often-reprinted L.A. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia published Secretary’s Order 01-2020, which is among the first of his management decisions since his confirmation back in September. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:12 am
Department of Justice: we’re going to use that Dear Colleague Title IX letter as a basis for prosecution, and colleges are going to need to crack down on speech if they want to stay in compliance [Eugene Volokh, Scott Greenfield, and FIRE, on University of New Mexico case] A brief history of how we got here from the Dear Colleague letter [Justin Dillon and Matt Kaiser, L.A. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:26 am
(Eugene Volokh) As I’ve mentioned before, we don’t know much about Elena Kagan’s views on particular free speech cases, largely because much of her work has been analysis and synthesis of existing doctrine, rather than prescription about the way things ought to be. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 am
(Eugene Volokh) Earlier today, I blogged the syllabus of the majority opinion, and noted my earlier thoughts that the statute is likely constitutional. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 3:05 am
Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention panel discussion on Justice Scalia, originalism, and the First Amendment with Profs. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 2:24 pm
It's sentencing day over at The Volokh Conspiracy: Eugene Volokh riffs here on the extreme sodomy sentence in Georgia (discussed here and with comments ablaze); Orin Kerr riffs here on Judge Fogel's ruling essentially declaring California's administration of lethal injection unconstitutional (discussed here and here). [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:38 pm
Yesterday, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press had this article discussing Justice Stevens's longevity on the Court; the state of the docket; and Justice Scalia's absence at the Court's annual spring concert. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:13 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Here are today’s opinion and the earlier opinion holding that plaintiffs had standing to sue. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 11:14 am
Some related post-Heller posts: Justice Scalia sells out felon gun rights, but on what basis exactly? [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:30 pm
--DRE ICYMI: Seven historians say Justice Clarence Thomas erred in writing in Box that “[f]rom the beginning, birth control and abortion were promoted as a means of effectuating eugenics. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:42 pm
., the United States presently embraces them by willfully ignoring how Holmes punished Porfirio Díaz’s leading critic Eugene V. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:42 pm
., the United States presently embraces them by willfully ignoring how Holmes punished Porfirio Díaz’s leading critic Eugene V. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:51 pm
Craig drew a sharp dissent from Justice Scalia, joined by Justices Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens; the dissent argued that the Confrontation Clause required face-to-face confrontation. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
JoAnn Koob at George Mason University [Antonin Scalia] School of Law told me about this project, which sounds very interesting, so I thought I'd pass it along. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:10 am
Eugene Volokh at the Volokh Conspiracy and Doug Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy bring word of an opinion issued yesterday in Britt v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:21 am
(Eugene Volokh) From the amicus brief for 48 states plus D.C. supporting Snyder in Snyder v. [read post]
