Search for: "Eugene Sullivan"
Results 81 - 100
of 370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2022, 11:37 am
Sullivan (1991). [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:35 pm
Sullivan, which required the actual malice test for public officials, but follow-on cases, such as Curtis Publishing v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:17 am
Sullivan</i>, from Leading Liberal Law Prof. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:27 am
Sullivan (1964). [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:55 pm
Sullivan. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm
Sullivan</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:34 pm
Sullivan (1999) ("Action taken by private entities with the mere approval or acquiescence of the State is not state action. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am
[Washington Governor Jay Inslee is supporting a law that would ban lies about election results that “are likely to incite or cause lawlessness”—an argument much like that made by supporters of the Sedition Act of 1798.] [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Guest Post by Samuel F. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:45 am
Sullivan and Snyder v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:23 am
Sullivan</i>" appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:44 pm
Sullivan, and we expect to be getting two more articles from prominent free speech scholars in the next couple of months as well. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm
Sullivan (1964). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 1:11 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 282-83 (1964.) [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:32 am
Sullivan did hold that an American government can't sue for defamation liability, even for knowing lies, and the same would likely apply to a foreign government. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 279 (1964) (quoting Speiser v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm
Sullivan case which had introduced the requirement of actual malice, stating that it was a “threat to American Democracy”. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 11:37 am
Sullivan; see Nuxoll ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
Sullivan, perhaps the Court's most important free-speech case, arose in this posture. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
Sullivan, the New York Times successfully challenged Alabama libel law rules, on the grounds that they allowed public officials to sue based on honest mistakes of fact (and not just knowing or reckless falsehoods)—but only as a defense to a libel lawsuit, after the suit was filed. [read post]