Search for: "Ex Parte Crawford"
Results 81 - 100
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 6:43 am
Despite the aura of reliability that science lends them, forensic laboratory reports are as prone to error and fraud as the ex parte affidavits the Confrontation Clause was designed to prohibit. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:50 am
But as Scalia’s opinion in Crawford indicates, the use of ex parte statements was heavily criticized at the time on grounds of reliability. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:22 am
Ellen Crawford (UFS)59. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
When interviewers believe themselves to be participants in an investigation that has targeted a particular criminal suspect, they conduct precisely the type of ex parte examinations that the Confrontation Clause protects against. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 am
State ex rel. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:28 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:14 pm
Melendez-Diaz, which now prevents the prosecutor from proving its case by way of ex-parte court affidavits and without the proponent being subject to cross-examination. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:33 pm
The panel was ably moderated by Susan Crawford. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:58 am
The Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz ruled that affidavits prepared by a forensic chemist were testimonial under Crawford. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
Crawford, 171 S.W.3d 323, 338 (Tex. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 11:06 am
Ex Parte Davis (BPAI Aug. 5, 2009) Today, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("BPAI"), in an opinion by Administrative Patent Judge Crawford, affirmed-in-part a rejection of claims relating to a method and implementation for managing a bid/auction over the web or any of the of electronically-enabled procurement process. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:38 pm
In Melendez-Diaz, the Court discussed that the Crawford opinion described the class of testimonial statements covered by the Confrontation Clause as follows: "Various formulations of this core class of testimonial statements exist: ex parte in-court testimony or its functional equivalentâ€â [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
Two recent Supreme Court decisions, Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:15 am
The Sixth Amendment does not permit the prosecution to prove its case via ex parte out-of-court affidavits, and the admission of such evidence against Melendez-Diaz was error. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:04 am
Click here for a more detailed summary.PD-0294-08, Ex parte Frank Eugene Watson: The CCA held that the inclusion of the phrase "failure to yield right of way" as a manner of committing intoxication assault did not make the traffic offense of failure to yield the right of way a lesser-included offense of intoxication assault. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 2:17 pm
See Ex Parte Lave, No. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Supreme Court Public Citizen's Cert Petition of Public Interest Archives hereSCOTUSblog's Petitions to Watch for 1-9-09 Conference hereRoss Runkel's US Supreme Court Employment Law Cases - Pending and Decided herePetition for Cert Granted: Crawford v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
And according to ABC News Supreme Court reporter Jan Crawford Greenberg, the give-and-take was quite lively. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Ct. at 2695 (Souter, J., concurring in part). [read post]
