Search for: "Ex Parte Crouch"
Results 81 - 100
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2020, 9:41 am
by Dennis Crouch Christy, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
But the word "conspiracy" was really just "rhetorical hyperbole" on Frenkel's part, argued Babcock. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am
By Dennis Crouch Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeals stated that this court has applied in past case the rule, which was issued by the Supreme Court in Ex parte Drummond Co., that a trial court cannot consider vocational disability as a factor in determining the exclusivity of the schedule. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:46 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
” In Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
However, in 2004, SCA filed for ex parte reexamination that was completed in 2007 with a confirmation of patentability. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:11 pm
Samsung successfully requested ex parte reexamination, arguing that the patents were invalid for ODP. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:28 am
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2788857 Goldman, Eric, Ex Parte Seizures and the Defend Trade Secrets Act (November 30, 2015). [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:18 am
See also Ex Parte Chowdhury, APPEAL 2020-006272, 2021 WL 4306675 (Patent Tr. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
Of these 97 reexaminations, 85 or 88% were ex parte and 12 or 12% were inter partes. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:56 am
by Dennis Crouch Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
L.J. 855 (2007)Text in which footnote appears: It therefore came as little surprise to many observers when in a recent administrative law decision, Ex parte Lundgren, n80 the USPTO's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences put to rest the technological arts exception.Footnote 81: See Patent Law Blog (Patently-O), BPAI "Informative' Opinion on Business Method Patents, http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/02/bpai_informativ.html (Feb. 16, 2007);5. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm
§ 174 — again in an ex parte proceeding. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:50 pm
by Dennis Crouch The bench was an active inquisitor in the Thryv v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:37 pm
” The decision will be captioned Ex parte Chamberlain, Appeal 22-1944, and is post-dated May 21, 2024. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:21 am
by Dennis Crouch The decision in Parus Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 4:58 am
Ex parte Hogan, 559 F.2d 595, 607 (Cust. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is on recess until Feb 17. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm
Lee, No. 16-205 (Does the “substantial new question of patentability” identified in a reexamination order limit the scope of the ex parte reexamination) Design Patents: Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
