Search for: "Ex Parte Forbes"
Results 81 - 100
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2013, 7:11 am
An ex-employee suing the company asserted that Adelson had approved a “prostitution strategy” for the company’s Macau properties–an inflammatory accusation against a prominent businessman, one of the wealthiest men in the world, and a longtime Republican booster. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:04 pm
In particular, courts in ex parte (unopposed) proceedings all too frequently rubber-stamp plaintiffs’ requests because the court only hears one side of the story. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
At Forbes, Jacob Sullum reminds us that the Obama Administration's record on the drug war has been generally atrocious. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:02 am
Here’s Forbes privacy blogger Kashmir Hill on a security flaw in a home automation system: Insteon’s flaw was worse in that it allowed access to any one via the Internet. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:02 am
Here’s Forbes privacy blogger Kashmir Hill on a security flaw in a home automation system: Insteon’s flaw was worse in that it allowed access to any one via the Internet. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:25 am
Mistakes like this are all too common in "ex parte" proceedings. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
At one performance, a local news reporter videotaped his entire act and broadcast it as part of the local news without his consent. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
Seay: A revenge porn victim sues her ex-boyfriend. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:07 am
Each of these variables can be tracked as part of an accountability and performance metric. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
Some parts of the CFAA requires a higher quantitative showing of damages, but many cases easily clear that threshold. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
The flexibility of antitrust law in adapting to new industries and modes of anticompetitive conduct is also a source of frustration, because the ex ante application of the domain’s broad principles to particular business practices is tricky to forecast without highly intensive, fact-specific analysis. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
(See Eric’s post at Forbes, which generated a fair amount of push back.) [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Jenni Rivera was not a household name in most parts of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
http://bit.ly/Xp5RPv (Michael Maslanka) eDiscovery and Social Media: Recap from TLI Litigation Summit, Part II – http://bit.ly/QnpRA4 (Gina Rubel) eDiscovery: Resolving Issues Through a Collaborative Approach – http://bit.ly/XBIXES (Martin O’Hara) eLessons Learned: Interview with the Honorable Ronald J. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
For more discussion, see “Ex-employees’ work for competitor OK, Inevitable disclosure doctrine inapplicable,” in New England In-House. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:55 am
Here is part of her summary. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
The first part, all 2,700 words of it, is a cross-post from Forbes last month assessing where we stood 6 months after January 18, 2012. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
http://bit.ly/MoacPj (Michael Arkfeld, Stephanie Loquvam) Be Considerate When You Share Data - http://bit.ly/QzeYZ7 (Amy Bowser-Rollins) Challenges of Conducting eDiscovery on Ephemeral Data - http://bit.ly/OCkHL1 (Brian Esser, Judy Selby) Concept over Keywords – Why Search Still Matters for Law Firms - http://bit.ly/Mh4Hkm (Simon Price) CVEDR Take II – Monkeys and Magistrates in Monterey - http://bit.ly/M3NM4u (Greg Buckles)… [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:49 pm
I wrote and posted a pithier version for Forbes. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The defamation case of Jooste v GMC was heard on 26 June 2012 and an ex tempore judgment given. [read post]
