Search for: "F/S Lance" Results 81 - 100 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
National Drug Co., 23 A.2d 743 (Pa. 1942), long before the concept of §402A strict liability in tort was even a gleam in a plaintiff’s lawyer’s eye. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:13 pm by Dmitry Karshtedt
On appeal, a unanimous panel of the Fifth Circuit, in an opinion written by Judge Edith Jones and joined by Judges Grady Jolly and Lance Africk (Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation), agreed with AQHA, reversed the district court’s judgment, and rendered judgment in AQHA’s favor.Fifth Circuit law holds that to prevail on a Section 1 claim, plaintiffs must demonstrate that defendants (1) engaged in a conspiracy (2) that produced some… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
John's Andreas Delgado ADCasteleiro Durham (UK) Michelle M. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Clarke donaldcclarke George Washington David Cleveland ProfCleveland Valparaiso Robert Clinton robertclinton Arizona  State David S. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:15 am
The California Supreme Court affirmed this limitation in In re Lance W. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
In In re Lance W., the California Supreme Court noted:We agree that Proposition 8 did not repeal either section 13 or section 24 of article I. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
  “[F]or policy reasons, this Court has declined to extend strict liability into the prescription drug arena. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:50 am
Un appel à contribution est lancé à l’adresse des doctorants, docteurs, post-doctorants et jeunes maîtres de conférence des universités de France et d’Allemagne, ou d’autres universités européennes pouvant justifier d’un sujet de recherche en rapport avec le thème général des journées conjointes. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
An allegedly representative ad asked “What is Lance Armstrong’s Secret What is Lance Armstrong’s Secret . . . [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
”  151 F.3d 269, 283 (5th Cir. 1998) (citing 35 F.3d at 758). [read post]