Search for: "F Vasquez"
Results 81 - 100
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2010, 3:37 am
Hutchinson, 471 F. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:19 am
Marciano, 882 F.2d 1411, 1416 (9th Cir.1989). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
Vasquez ‘s “Muslim faith was a key theme . . . [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
In favorem muerte Richard Vasquez v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
by Paul Bland, Claire Prestel, and Melanie Hirsch The consumer and civil rights communities are closely watching AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
Jones, 673 F. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:40 pm
Jones, 673 F. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
I f they want to, prosecutors can decide that street-level defendants like Vasquez--the low-hanging fruit for law enforcement--must receive the harsh sentences that Congress intended for kingpins and managers, no matter how many other factors weigh in favor of less severe sentences. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:37 am
Vasquez, 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
Commissioner [full text] (1/19/10) TCM 2010-11, No. 17922-08 (Vasquez) 2010 WL 174107. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:13 am
Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 574, 579 (7th Cir. 2003) (finding Ninth Circuit’s decision “untenable” and declining to follow it); Vasquez-Velezmoro v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:25 am
§ 1957(f)(1).The motion began with a quote from Banking Crimes: Fraud Money Laundering and Embezzlement, by John K. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
Ruckes,__ F.3d __, No. 08-30088 , 2009 WL 3719209 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2009) (discussed here), a case decided this past June in which the panel had reversed a within-guidelines sentence as substantively unreasonable. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See esp. pp. 56-61 on Vasquez.] [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:02 am
Vasquez, 918 F.2d 329, 333 (2d Cir.1990). [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:04 am
Vasquez-Ortiz, 2009 U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
" Vasquez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
Vasquez-Castillo, 258 F.3d 1207, 1211 (10th Cir. 2001), United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:13 am
Amezcua-Vasquez,__ F.3d __, No. 07-50239, 2009 WL 1508566 (9th Cir. [read post]
