Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2024, 8:49 am
Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”): The FTC announced that it has issued orders to eight companies that offer surveillance pricing products and services that incorporate data about consumers’ characteristics and behavior. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am
However, after page administrator Andy Leonard spent over $20,000 in legal fees defending a matter in the Federal Court over a comment that was left on the group page he ran on Facebook in 2023, the pages as closing. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am
Federal Trade Commission 21-406Issues: (1) Whether the presence of a “reverse payment” that exceeds a patentee’s saved litigation costs and the value of any services provided by a patent challenger suffices to render a patent settlement unlawful, despite the Supreme Court’s holding to the contrary in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
In work with students that I presented at the Federal Trade Commission’s recent hearings building on an earlier analysis in IP Watchdog by Will Gvoth, Rocky Bernsden, and Peter Glaser from Harrity & Harrity LLP, I observed that there has been a “flight to quality” among patent complaints and applications. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
(IP Tango) (IP Watch) (China Hearsay) (IP Tango) The LG trade mark and contested priority (IP Tango) Canada Malcolm Parry’s VANCOUVER LIFE fails to impress Federal Court: Sim & McBurney v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
(IP Tango) (IP Watch) (China Hearsay) (IP Tango) The LG trade mark and contested priority (IP Tango) Canada Malcolm Parry’s VANCOUVER LIFE fails to impress Federal Court: Sim & McBurney v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Smith & Co., 873 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
Menell, The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79 Donald S. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 8:33 am
Current Trade Mark Law and Practice in the EU and UK | 6th Global Forum on Intellectual Property: Ideas to Assets | Reality TV stars: performers? [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Smith and Cornelius v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) announced he intended to introduce regulations to the Bitcoin marketplace. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
”[1] In the depths of the Great Depression, Congress and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (known for a slightly more famous quotation about “fear”) enacted the first federal securities laws. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
(relisted after the September 24, October 5 and October 12 conferences) Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:04 am
Beaty, 288 F.2d 653, 656 (6th Cir. 1961) (likewise, as to landlords’ retaliation against their sharecropper tenants); see also Smith v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Federal Trade Commission, Supreme Court Watch Your Derivatives: The Role 13Fs Play in Detecting Shareholder Activism Posted by David Farkas, Georgeson LLC, on Thursday, September 5, 2024 Tags: Activists, Form 13F, SEC, Shareholders [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Federal Trade Commission, Supreme Court Watch Your Derivatives: The Role 13Fs Play in Detecting Shareholder Activism Posted by David Farkas, Georgeson LLC, on Thursday, September 5, 2024 Tags: Activists, Form 13F, SEC, Shareholders [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:46 am
Here, on "Let the Dance Begin: the FTC PAE Study is On", Arleen Malley Zank writes on the fact that, in the US, the Federal Trade Commission has received the go-ahead for a major review of patent assertion entities: the budget allows for nearly 30,000 person-hours between now and the end of August 2017 to examine the impact of PAEs on the IP monetisation ecosystem (katpat to Nigel Sywcher for unearthing the link). [read post]
