Search for: "Fico v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2021, 9:21 am
A state cannot control its people on the basis of negatives (e.g., we are not the United States). [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
En cuanto al mandato constitucional sobre fianza no excesiva, el informe positivo puntualiza e intenta adoptar lo resuelto en Hodgdon v United States, 365 F. 2d 679 (1966), que es un caso del Octavo Circuito que establece que una fianza no es inconstitucional sólo porque el imputado no puede prestarla por razón de falta de recursos. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:26 pm
The Cuban government announced, as is its habit now, through the show "Mesa Redonda", a set of potentially far ranging reforms of the non state sector and its regulation. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
It is worth considering if only because it represents, in a general way, much of the thinking that is gaining increasing traction not just among developing states, but also among a certain sector of academic and policy elites in liberal democratic developed states. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:45 pm
This post includes that intiial address in the original Spanish with a crude English translation, along with brief reflections on the state of Caribbean Marxism (considered in more detail here) in Cuba and its potential future course. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 8:50 pm
Now the PCC has proposed, through its state organs, to change the Cuban constitution to reflect these changes as well. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:58 am
Análisis de jurisprudencia bajo Hobbs y RICO En Scheidler v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:13 am
This has been intensified as the Cuban intelligentsia has become more deeply embedded within institutions in and around the Caribbean, forging complex intellectual links in and around the state--links that cannot be ignored. [read post]
15 May 2012, 4:05 pm
No digamos ya las responsabilidades penales derivadas de mentiras para la captación de menores con fines abusivos o pornográficos. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 8:32 pm
Sostuvo dicha aseveración indicando que el Tribunal Supremo federal en el caso Gentile v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 8:28 am
Thjose disruptions have spread through the cruise ship industry that itself has been the subject of several highly publicized incidents in which their ships were denied docking rights or otherwise where their passangers were quarantined (The coronavirus has sent shockwaves through the cruise industry, spurring Carnival, Royal Caribbean, and Norwegian Cruise Line to take drastic measures to keep their passengers from getting sick).Most Caribbean States have begun to prepare for infection:As… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Pueblo v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 7:13 am
LA DEBIDA DILIGENCIA EN LAS UNIVERSIDADESLarry Catá BackerPennsylvania State University. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
El CONAHCYT coordinará el Plan Nacional para la Innovación en beneficio de la sociedad y del desarrollo nacional con la participación de universidades, pueblos, científicos y empresas. 10. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 9:53 am
Si quieren verla (son 5 páginas, nada más) pueden descargársela en Acrobat desde este link, al que llegamos vÃÂa Paloma Llaneza.Lo que hay detrás de la demanda: reglas para los testigos en un juicioChambers demanda a Dios porque dice que quiere demostrar que en los Estados Unidos "cualquiera puede demandar a cualquiera".Bueno, de eso se trata un… [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 8:22 am
Aunque con esa limitación, "Sánchez" -con Boggiano como único disidente- es la matriz que fraguó por sus fundamentos el fallo unánime de la vÃspera.Eppur si muove: el fallo "Badaro"A partir de 2002, los jubilados sà tuvieron varios aumentos, pero casi todos ellos fueron dados como "sumas fijas" y asignados a los que tenÃan los haberes mÃnimos. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:19 am
The Frankfurter Papers are of special note because they reveal how the Supreme Court approached the Brown v. [read post]
14 Dec 2005, 3:40 pm
United States", 383 U.S. 541, 1966)".Hay otras cosas interesantes que dice la Corte sobre derecho penal, en las que trasciende el tema puntual de la punición a menores.El concepto de peligrosidad: "no corresponde a la competencia de esta Corte interpretar el alcance especÃfico de la expresión "peligrosidad" contenida en el art. 41 del Código Penal. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
Por el Lcdo. [read post]
