Search for: "First Notice Systems, Inc. v R " Results 81 - 100 of 913
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2021, 5:39 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court also warned Antoine that further frivolous appeals will subject him to monetary fines and a possible bar order pursuant to Support Systems International, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 3:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
But I am sure I am not the only one that has noticed that there have been a host of recent high- profile supply chain issues. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:24 pm by Anthony Zaller
Time rounding for meal breaks is not permitted under California law The California Court of Appeal held in See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They relied on the 1997 decision in Edmond v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
This is the effect of R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2, a judgment handed down on 5 February 2021. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am by admin
I noticed her deposition in all Philadelphia asbestos cases and gave all plaintiffs’ firms notice of the event. [read post]
Consequences can include substantial lost revenue for your business, diminished regard by investors, or those who have purchased a license related to the trade secret.i Further, misappropriation of trade secrets undermines the process and incentives for authors to develop products, systems, or services. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
While district courts generally have inherent authority and discretion regarding the “manage[ment of] their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases,” see PDC Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]