Search for: "First v. Armes (1983)"
Results 81 - 100
of 383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court previously rejected this argument in In re Kivett, 309 N.C. 635, 670 (1983), which defeated this claim. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
In Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
First up among this week’s new relists: Kansas, fresh off a couple of wins in criminal law cases, seeks review in Kansas v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
The first is Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
§ 1983 or the relevant common law background, and which has been shown not to serve its intended policy goals, should be narrowed or abolished. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
The section 1983 suit asserted several due process and equal protection claims, including the one discussed here. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
Gemme v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
The defendant was indicted and found guilty in superior court of charges of first-degree murder, attempted armed robbery, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
Both the Bush and Obama administrations construed the 2002 AUMF to provide the domestic legal authority for armed conflict against Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, and for military force against armed militia groups that sought to drive U.S. forces out of Iraq after the regime fell.14 I personally do not believe the 2001 AUMF covers armed conflict against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, or, as some have argued, that the 2002 AUMF for Iraq can be stretched to have justified… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am
The post Petitions of the week appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:30 am
§ 1983, alleging a Fourth Amendment violation. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983). [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 3:59 pm
Central UTA of Monsey v Village of Airmont, 2020 WL 377706 (SDNY 1/23/2020) [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am
As such, it would fall under a separate set of provisions and related expedited procedures under the War Powers Resolution—provisions widely believed to be unconstitutional following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
§ 1983. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:31 pm
" Janus v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
