Search for: "Fisher v. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
Here's the panel:  Judges Kozinski, Schroeder, Thomas, Graber, Fisher, Gould, Paez, Tallman, Rawlinson, Bea and Randy Smith. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:22 pm
And the six judges on the majority, who found that there was both a violation and no qualified immunity, admittedly consisted of a Carter appointee (Judge Pregerson) and three Clinton appointees (Judges Wardlaw, Fisher, and Paez), but it was the swing votes of two of the most recent Bush II appointees -- the Judges Smith -- that made the difference.Yes, draws matter. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:34 am
Judgment for defendants Counsel: For the claimant: James Abrahams For the first defendant: Anna Edwards-Stuart For the second defendant: Daniel Alexander QC, Charlotte May Solicitors: For the claimant: Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP For the first defendant: Manches LLP For the second defendant: Herbert Smith LLP LTL 6/8/2012 [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
Which only has four votes: his, Chief Judge Schroeder's, and Judges Fisher and Gould. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am by Amy Howe
” And in his column for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps eulogizes Al Smith, the respondent in Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:13 pm
And my view is that footnote 6 of the Ninth Circuit's opinion, in which Judge Fisher says that recording the actual URLs perhaps might be a search, is a distinction without a difference. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:18 am
The 9th (Fisher joined by Clifton and Smith) easily dismissed the government's harmless error argument, and vacated and reversed. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 8:20 am by Jon Sands
Smith with Reinhardt and Paez). [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 6:25 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  This is also discussed by the Texas Supreme Court in the 1963, opinion styled, Smith v. [read post]