Search for: "Flores v. Borders"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
USA Eastern District of Kentucky at Ashland 08a0620n.06 Herrera Flores v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
""The Supreme Court has said that " ‘searches made at the border . . . are reasonable simply by virtue of the fact that they occur at the border.' " Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. at 152-53(quoting Ramsey, 431 U.S. at 616); see also Cortez-Rocha, 394 F.3d at 1118-19. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 2:16 pm
The links in the article go to: an IEEE article, Setting Boundaries at Borders: Reconciling Laptop Searches and Privacy; a Supreme Court opinion, US v Flores-Montano 541 U.S. 149 (2004) and a LATimes editorial, Looking into laptops [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149, 152-53 (2004). [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
As a result, one principle underlying the caselaw on border searches--namely, that "a port of entry is not a traveler's home," United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:16 am
Flore-Castaneda, 2008 U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:45 am
As Flores-Montano makes clear, the Fourth Amendment does not shield individuals from "inconvenience or delay at the international border". [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
" Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. at 152. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:20 am
Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149, 153 (2004) ("Congress, since the beginning of our Government, has granted the Executive plenary authority to conduct routine searches and seizures at the border, without probable cause or a warrant .... [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 7:16 am
US v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:14 am
Flores-Sanchez, No. 06-10026 (2-15-07). [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
Flores, 2007 U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 7:57 am
Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149, 152- 53, 124 S.Ct. 1582, 158 L.Ed.2d 311 (2004) (quoting United States v. [read post]
