Search for: "Florian v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 12:26 am
The DOJ may want to wait for the Ninth Circuit opinion in Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 7:11 am
of the 25 aforementioned Uniloc v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:12 pm
The Apple v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am
And I would be – I mean, I would be surprised if, in their obligations in the United States they haven't made that disclosure.There's definitely some pressure on Samsung down under and it has to answer some questions now. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:49 am
Samsung points to the January 2011 Federal Circuit decision in Uniloc v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:12 am
At the first FTC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 7:10 pm
United Kingdom 476 Sirko Harder United States 515 Patrick J. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:48 am
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California decided to enjoin Huawei from enforcing two Chinese standard-essential patent (SEP) injunctions against Samsung until a breach-of-contract question has been adjudicated in the U.S., where a trial is scheduled for December (this post continues below the document): 18-04-13 Order Granting Samsung Antisuit Injunction Against Huawei by Florian Mueller on ScribdAs I had already predicted on the… [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:57 am
There have been further filings since the Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm
The winning firm is Hausfeld, a firm with offices in the United States and Europe. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:35 pm
Tex. and unsuccessfully appealed by Ericsson's adversary in that case, HTC, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:50 pm
On November 18, 2013 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived Apple's bid for a permanent patent injunction against Samsung's Android-based devices with respect to three multitouch software patents (rubber-banding, tap-to-zoom-and-navigate, and pinch-to-zoom API), while affirming Judge Lucy Koh's denial of injunctive relief with respect to the asserted design patents. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:53 pm
This is a monumental patent dispute (that has all the ingredients for further escalation), so litigation watchers like me have to put the mosaic together step by step.This is the current landscape of Ericsson-Apple cases pending in the United States, just so we have a forest here and not just a lot of trees:FRAND actionsEricsson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 11:34 am
I thought I had covered the Ericsson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to bar within a matter of hours--ex parte, i.e., without a hearing--Avanci, Nokia, Sharp, Conversant (which has very recently become the third and latest Avanci member to sue Daimler for patent infringement, as I reported earlier today), and Optis from seeking another AAII against Continental in Germany.Today's TRO motion renews the original pursuit of a U.S. antisuit injunction against those… [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
As I speculated in my previous post on Ericsson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Let me share just one more observation for now: Apple tries hard to distinguish its case from HTC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm
"Three weeks ago, Apple and Samsung agreed to withdraw all litigation pending between them outside the United States. [read post]
