Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2014, 9:32 pm
In McCullen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:09 am
Luckett, December 2, 2015, Supreme Court of Montana More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
Elias LJ gave the lead judgment, with which Lewison and Floyd LJJ agreed. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Baselines for Terry Stops In Floyd v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:22 am
Winfrey v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
Lord Justice Floyd’s reasoning chimes with the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, which states that “an application may only be objected to for lack of sufficient disclosure if there are serious doubts, substantiated by verifiable facts” (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, II, C.6.1.4). [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:07 pm
In Manning v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 4:41 am
His 2017 win in Bristol Myers Squibb v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 5:49 pm
People v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:20 am
Floyd Mayweather Jr. boxing match. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:23 am
Boney v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Bill Moyers' Journal on 4 Sept 09 had a debate of sorts between Trevor Potter and Floyd Abrams over issues surrounding Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:07 am
This guest Kat steps briefly out of his comfort zone to bring his dear readers slightly belated news of the Court of Appeal decision, handed down on 10 May 2012, in Nokia v IPCom [full citation: Nokia OYJ (Nokia Corporation) v IPCom GmbH & Co Kg [2012] EWCA Civ 567 (10 May 2012)]. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
At first instance Mr Justice Floyd found the patent valid (under the headings of novelty, inventive step and sufficiency) although he construed the claim in one respect (the meaning of " a medicament for the treatment of a non-neoplastic disease or disorder characterised by undesirable excessive neovascularisation") in a manner different from that put forward by either the claimants or the defendant, stating: I see no reason to recast the definition either as… [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Hence Irwin LJ found that the “underlying principle in Zambrano is undisturbed by Chavez-Vilchez” and in the latter case the referring court was looking for guidance in circumstances where a child was dependent on one non-EU parent with no right of residence; circumstances in which the state must ensure a careful process of enquiry. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
