Search for: "Foreign International Surveillance Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2013, 10:34 am
Governments should not bypass national privacy protections by relying on secretive informal data sharing agreements with foreign states or private international companies. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 am
The majority said it was satisfied that the wiretapping program was subject to safeguards including supervision by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court which meets in secret and is supposed to review actions taken under FISA. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:38 am
Because the collection occurs in foreign countries, such as when Americans' data crosses international borders, it does not fit the FISA definition of "electronic surveillance", and neither the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) nor Congress oversee the program. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
It is conducted under a controversial law known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:45 am
Bulk Internet metadata collection inside the US was approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:28 pm
But in the course of this surveillance, “the NSA is seizing Americans’ communications en masse”, says the court filing. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 2:28 pm
Members of the community must have the power to go to court to enforce these safeguards, and evidence collected in violation of these safeguards must be excluded from court proceedings. 10. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
Under that program, known internally as Stellar Wind, Administration officials negotiated with telecommunications companies to obtain on U.S. soil their foreign-to-domestic traffic, doing so without obtaining court warrants. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:21 am
For example, in 2008, Congress enacted Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, authorizing the warrantless surveillance of Americans’ private international communications — including our phone calls, emails, chats, and web browsing. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:13 am
Enter Amnesty International and the other plaintiffs in Clapper. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:15 am
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows the government to warrantlessly monitor Americans’ international emails, web-browsing activities, and phone calls with the assistance of companies like Facebook, Google, AT&T, and Verizon. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
The NSA has been permitted for decades to collect international communications, including those with one end in the United States, as long as its target is foreign. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:30 pm
The Sénat’s version also develops the “foreign” policy prong, saying that, along with the essential interests of foreign policy, surveillance is justified to enforce international or European treaties or commitments to which France is a party, as well as to prevent “all forms of foreign interference” to those international or European commitments. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:50 pm
These were the second reading of a National Security Amendment Bill which grants new surveillance powers to Australia's spy agency, ASIO, and the first reading of a Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Bill that outlaws speech seen as “advocating terrorism”. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:49 pm
FACT: The FAA authorizes surveillance of Americans’ international communications. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:30 pm
“A federal judge [on June 13, 2014] ordered the Department of Justice to hand over key opinions by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (also known as the “FISA court”) so the judge can directly review whether information about mass surveillance was improperly withheld from the public. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:06 am
The plaintiffs, including attorneys, journalists and rights organizations, facially challenged [JURIST report] Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [50 USC § 1881(a) text], which was added by the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (FAA) [HR 6304 materials]. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:49 am
Yet clear abuses continue, in violation of internal policies: for example, the most recent FISA Court opinion on Section 702 describes inappropriate queries for a U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:57 am
There may be a loss of confidence at international level in the Irish systems which may inhibit the flow of intelligence and subsequently of evidence.7. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 11:58 pm
Critics of the program say it violates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) and the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
