Search for: "Forth v. Forth" Results 81 - 100 of 21,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In order not to be considered speculative or conclusory, expert opinions in opposition should address specific assertions made by the movant’s experts, setting forth an explanation of the reasoning and relying on specifically cited evidence in the record” (Longhi v Lewit, 187 AD3d at 878 [internal quotation marks omitted]; Lowe v Japal, 170 AD3d at 703). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am by David Aaron
  The RISAA compromise, set forth in Section 2, would not impose a warrant requirement. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division (EEOC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:13 pm
But otherwise, it's just a typical application of a set group of established legal principles to the particular facts at issue here.Not that I particularly care if an author decides to publish an opinion that seems fairly clearly to meet none of the nine alternative standards for publication set forth in Rule 8.1105(c). [read post]