Search for: "Forum Holdings, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 2,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2013, 7:23 am by Kristin Barlett
., holding that a derivative suit against Botox-maker Allergan, Inc. should be dismissed because Allergan had already secured a judgment in its favor in a nearly identical suit in California. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:33 am by Will Aitchison
Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 2011 WL 2174375 (E.D. [read post]
The post Court of Federal Claims Holds Non-Bidder Has Standing to Protest Two Years After Contract Award appeared first on Government Contracts Legal Forum. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:33 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe Internet Cases blog comes through again, reporting on this decision, holding that the forum selection clause in AOL’s terms of service does not trump the State of Washington’s consumer fraud law. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:09 pm
AG Paintball Holdings, Inc., 2008 WL  343856  (Del.Ch., Feb. 7, 2008), read opinion here, the Delaware Chancery ruled on the issue of who holds the attorney-client privilege when a company is sold in an asset sale, and the successor continues to operate the business? [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
In so holding, the majority also refused to answer a question referred to it by the 9th Circuit-- whether the airport is a public forum. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
Analysis: The court first acknowledged the Supreme Court’s holding that: “When the parties have agreed to a valid forum-selection clause, a district court should ordinarily transfer the case to the forum specified in that clause. [read post]
This post is part of the Delaware law series, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available here. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:45 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
In analyzing this requirement, the Court cited cases with contrary holdings. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:27 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
The plaintiff must show “strong cause” that the case is exceptional and that the forum selection clause should not be enforced: Expedition Helicopters Inc v Honeywell Inc., 2010 ONSC 351, at para. 11. [read post]