Search for: "Fox Television Holdings Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am by Mike Madison
Holdings, Inc., 931 F. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am by Eugene Volokh
The Act is therefore far more like the ordinance in Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 4:45 pm by Barry Sookman
Whether the law school participated in the Fox Moot and the success including placements of the team in the last two years. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm by Lowell Brown
The celebrity can become embroiled in scandal, such as Paula Dean, causing an empire of product endorsements, television shows, and book deals to crumble almost overnight. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/qDmsnfGJFq -> Google reveals avalanche of link removal requests http://t.co/lWd2K4FgRa -> USPTO Again Rejects Apple’s Claim of Pinch-to-Zoom Patent http://t.co/YrME6CTcOi -> Four Tips from Merck’s $180M Patent Damages Win Against Apotex http://t.co/znvGmK3isO -> Google scholar link to FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am by Terry Hart
We are, some might argue, in a new golden age of television, with shows that are enjoyed by millions. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:37 pm by admin
CSC Holdings, Inc., 536 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2008), the court granted summary judgment for Cablevision that their proposed RS-DVR system did not infringe as reproductions or public performances. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Fox Television Stations, et al., 10-1293). [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Joseph Tomain
Fox Television Stations, Inc. nears, a brief history of indecency regulation may be of interest and begins with a tie to music. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am by Kiran Bhat
Fox Television Stations, Inc.) and concludes that “[t]he confusion of courts, broadcasters and the viewing public is understandable, but the remedies are less evident. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am by Guest Author
To be fair, however, such timidity may be understandable by a media industry anomalously denied full First Amendment protection throughout its history and at risk for increasingly large fines from the government agency that holds its license. [read post]