Search for: "Frank Kavanaugh"
Results 81 - 100
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 8:18 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh did not participate in the consideration of the appeal because he was involved in reviewing the case during his prior tenure as a DC Circuit judge. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
The past year also saw a change in the composition of the Supreme Court in April of 2018, with Justice Neil Gorsuch assuming the seat of Antonin Scalia after his passing in 2016, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh taking the seat of Anthony Kennedy in October 2018, after Kennedy’s retirement and a bruising Senate confirmation battle. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
It also marks another term with a new justice – this time Justice Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:03 pm
Specifically, Judge Kavanaugh authored the D.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 1:06 pm
Finally, while Nadler said he will not move to impeach Justice Brett Kavanaugh, he indicated plans to examine other issues associated with Kavanaugh’s confirmation process. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 10:05 am
” (It is not surprising that the DOJ would want Justice Kavanaugh to participate given that he authored the D.C. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:28 pm
" Nor did they jump at the government's argument that "on sale" means a product can be purchased by its ultimate consumers—Justice Sotomayor said: "This definition of 'on sale,' to be frank with you, I've looked at the history cited in the briefs, I looked at the cases, I don't find it anywhere. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:50 pm
For her, though, like Kavanaugh, it was not credible that the revision of the statute in 2011 was specific enough to change the settled meaning. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am
Pepper, in which the justices considered whether iPhone-app purchasers can bring an antitrust suit against Apple for monopolizing the market for the apps and making consumers overpay, and Frank v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:01 am
Supreme Court calls for supplemental briefing on whether named plaintiffs in Frank v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
” Ronald Mann reports for this blog that yesterday the justices called for additional briefing in Frank v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:28 am
It’s not hard to see where the justices are leaning in Frank v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am
Yesterday the justices heard oral argument in Frank v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 1:26 pm
In the first, Frank v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
” Frank v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:17 am
Look at the post-Kavanaugh-hearings polls.The WaPo article also has the new Hillary Clinton quote (which we talked about yesterday here): "You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:22 am
(Poor Brett Kavanaugh! [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 12:08 pm
“What Has Brett Kavanaugh Done to Us? [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 3:08 pm
The New York Times has an op-ed from Frank Bruni and commentary from the Times’ Editorial Board. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
If Brett Kavanaugh is not confirmed by the Senate, the Court would have only 8 Justices and be at risk of having some split (4-4) decisions. [read post]
